Watch the main stream news stories. They might just have us chasing our tail, and may be contributing to mass anxiety, more fear mongering, and more divisiveness. Yes, there most certainly is a method(s) to madness.
Do I trust what the weather guys have to say about the chance of snow or wind? The weather folks are not lying, at least not with the data available to them at the time. But I’ll continue looking out my window at the sky, not with the intent to prove them wrong (maybe with language more regularly used by actor Samuel Jackson), but with the intent of looking after our horses, chickens, and crops.
Same applies with ALL media. Be aware. Always ask questions, and most importantly why.
In the Army, we often said, “don’t fix what ain’t broke.” We also said the new commander of any unit, doesn’t matter, wanted to put his stamp on things. We knew the newbie was most likely going to change things, an always painful process. A good commander usually didn’t, at least not at first. Yet, good commanders were few and far between. He gave it time before making any wholesale changes. As my good friend Dave, a retired Army sergeant major, said, “Why do most new commanders do it? Why not? Because they can.”
Suddenly, our government is good, chaste and pure, and back on the righteous path? How many executive actions have been signed in the first two weeks? And the case numbers of the V have plummeted? I will insist that’s not coincidence since our apparent government changed hands. I will not say anyone is totally good or totally bad. But I will say, there is evil. I thank God I have not come across any soulless beings, at least not on the physical plain. But that’s a whole different story. I’ll get to that another time.
Then there’s a group I call fence sitters. I say, let them be there, not wrestling steer or breaking a wild mustang. Or, at least shoveling manure. Or, in other words, earning a day’s keep. The way I see it, God has a plan. We each play a role. However, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
As for me, I’ll continue managing our farm. And, I’ll also continue to say what I think needs to be said, and doing what I think needs to be done. However, I will not participate in any activity which breaks our freedoms. If any federal agency thinks it can take my hunting rifle away from me, well… over my dead body. I will defend myself, my wife, our farm from those who wish to impinge upon our God given rights. To buttress this statement, I quote from the movie “Good Will Hunting,” when Matt Damon’s character says to the judge when Will has taken up his own counsel stemming from his assault on a police officer (irony): “Excuse me, I’m afforded the right to speak in my own defense by The Constitution of the United States, this is the same document which guarantees my liberty, and liberty in case you’ve forgotten, is a soul’s right to breathe. And when I cannot take a long breath, laws are girdled too tight.” At least, Will got his day in court.
I also will not participate in mask wearing considering the multitude of health care workers’ opinions; a great deal of them still in conflict, apparently to confuse the masses. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: We (homo sapiens) have roamed this Earth for how long? And we ain’t dead yet? Ever hear of herd immunity? As a species, we have adapted and overcome in many instances. There’s the self-inflicted crap like war. I’ll let you look up the statistics on the number of worldwide deaths yourself. You should have that pleasure and privilege.
In short, what I am asking for people to do here, when they read my blog, is to think for themselves.
God knows I tried to do that as a high school teacher. My education philosophy was about getting people to work together, a community effort. They didn’t need to like each other to do it. So when two bullheaded students came together, and it seemed neither one was going to win, they either found a way, or received a failing grade. What they usually discovered is that they must consider all sides, even what they may have considered the minority opinion.
Then it was visible. Human behavior tells it all. Tyranny emerged. (I called them bullies some of them trolls that have visited this blog.) Delegations were created, giving them some latitude. Sometimes democracy. A majority vote decided it, what ever it was. There were moderators, mediators, and peace makers. Whatever role the students played, I believed each one would learn something, unique, beyond the assignment. Or, if they were fence sitters, they would commit to nothing, therefore gain nothing. Their individual grade was F. Oh, don’t worry, I was clear about the criteria, fully explaining the rubric. They were given copies of everything, and plenty of time to ask questions. Of course, I’d find some of the copies in the trash bucket or on the floor of the hallway. They signed contracts, which some adhered to. Need I say more?
Yet, this is not going along to get along. I did not force them to do anything. The classroom is not a prison. But if you consider our laws, and that our public education system is absolute and mandatory, then you would be wrong. Parents have the option to home school their children, or not educate them at all. They get to choose the material with which to get the job done, which I applaud. The more books, the more views, the more choices, the better.
My only real requirement as a teacher, despite the state education objectives, was to get kids to think, to question everything, to expand their minds for perhaps a better quality of life. So, let me get to why I have said all of this, using my teaching experience as an example. We need to consider the alternatives in life. I looked after all my students, including the homeless, battered and neglected. I asked them to consider choices. If you don’t think for yourself, then “think” that you have few options for how to change your world, then you have not acted.
Let’s start with the topic of virology. Where would you even began to look for information to learn more? You might ask why, considering you have experts telling you on the evening news, spoon feeding you the answers. Why look any further? When during this crisis moment did anyone go to the library? We have them in just about every city, town and village and most of them sans a great deal of high traffic. Or, at your fingertips, the Internet, with complete lists of medical doctors who might comment. Yes, they do countermand each other, all the time.
But you know what, I’d really rely on old Number One, me, and check the medical books myself. I have come to a conclusion, the right one for me, when it regards my body and my health; I am going to settle for my answer.
So, while on the subject of virology, let’s consider if the sickness was manmade, for mainstream reports of the sickness coming out of a lab, according to one news source, the Toronto Sun, which carried a story just this past week with the headline: “WHO advisor: COV-XX pandemic likely started via lab leak.” Wait a minute. Back on September 15, 2020, didn’t Tucker Carlson on Fox News interview a Coronavirus whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan who said inextricably that the V did come out of a lab? I’m confused. We are looking at five months between stories.
At the beginning of the V being announced a widespread worldwide sickness in March 2020, despite the fact that I did not see dead bodies in the street, there were few medical experts who could tell us about a forensic trail, which meant: Who was Patient Zero? And then how did the sickness logically spread? If I missed that story or stories, send me any evidence you have. What investigative bodies are responsible for getting the truth out?
Evidence might include patents. By the way take a look at several with Richard A. Rothschild’s name on them. (Keep in mind the name, even though it appears Internet scrubbers are out in force to say he has no connection to the patents found on Justia.com at the very least. Follow this link, then visit the site itself inputting the patent numbers. His name is still there. (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/richard-a-rothschild) I am not certain who would go to such lengths to fabricate such boring and intriguing documents, but you are welcome to keep a grain of salt firmly in mouth.
If the sickness came out of a lab, that meant, given the fact that it was harmful, that also meant, that it could well have been weaponized. Keep in mind all the players and the coordinated efforts. If weaponized or dangerous to the lives of most human beings, we need to consider the intent. Why create something if you are not going to use it. Think back in history. If human beings created the atom bomb, then used it in war, why wouldn’t these types of terrible human beings (mass murderers) not use other means such as chemical and biological weapons as well. As a man who thinks strategy, covert is better than overt. Wouldn’t that make the V a violation of the Geneva Convention rules, thus crime against humanity? Just spit-balling here.
I mean, c’mon man, let’s consider the inhumaneness of such creations, in fact, it is a crime against humanity. What happened in Hiroshima, and Nagasaki? Then Chernobyl. Let’s not forget Fukushima. Negligence? Was anyone ultimately held responsible for the slaughter of innocent human beings, to include non-involved citizens, men, women and children, not to mention all the creatures, flora and fauna, etc.? Remember, I don’t believe in accidents.
Now with some information, you are armed. As a self-made journalist, and possibly a reporter, you must stick to this format: Who. What. When. Where. How. And Why. And always beware the anonymous source. If your editor is worth his weight, he or she won’t accept your story. Back out to track down a few more sources.
Why is it important to ask these questions. The simple answer my friends, given this world, and a set of common laws, you can expect some people to keep them, and others to break them. Remember the service-to-self people (Wall Street), and the expression: “greed will be the end of us?” Does the 1 percent need more than half the world’s wealth? Since I am interested in keeping harmony and peace in this world, I’ll continue to do this kind of work.
So, why is it important what you think? Consider this method to madness even if it is just a laundry list of ideas.
On September 29, 1959, the then Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev addressed listeners outside his nation. I say listeners because, first your mind has to be open to this. Already, I believe, the New York Times, has tried to head off this information from making the rounds or any impact. And, by the way, the long-standing publication in Gotham has been proven to make mistakes. The New York Times has tried to say this historic speech by Khrushchev did not take place and that therefore, the quotes by him have been disproved or using their go-to trigger word “debunked.” Then we get into that whole argument of fake, and I am not going there.
So, remember what I said. Ask why. Is it entirely possible within the context of historic events for the Soviet Union leader to say such a thing? In my personal view: Yep. Remember something called the Cold War? The idea of blowing up our world by both United States and USSR left us in a stalemate. The war to end all wars would also put an end to our world.
(As a former journalist, I can attest to making my fair share of mistakes and running corrections/retractions. Also, check out a fact-check by Project Veritas which rebuts a New York Times front-page story on a United States Postal Worker’s whistleblowing testimony on voter fraud in the November 3, 2020 presidential election. By the way, the postal worker said on social media that he did not recant his testimony.)
Without further adieu, here is the quote from Khrushchev in it’s entirety according to website Lobbyists for Citizens:
“Your children’s children will live under Communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept Communism outright; but we will keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you; We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands. The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
Remember, Socialism leads to Communism. So, how do you create a Socialistic State?
There are eight levels of control; read the following recipe:
1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people. (Need I comment on big spenders on Capitol Hill, special interests, the Big Pharma industry’s treat-the-symptom-not-the-cause approaches, not to mention exorbitant health insurance prices.)
2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible; poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them. (The willingness of people to wear masks and take the jab to keep their jobs; don’t tell me I’m exaggerating. I have spoken to a number of people on this.)
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. (About 60 percent of households on average in my community participate in the free lunch program. How do they qualify? Well, look that up for your own community, and the level of income it takes or doesn’t take for a family.)
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government. That way you are able to create a police state. (My wife and I got a letter last month from the NRA saying this might just happen, and likely to be carried out by the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. And, thus we have entered a police state. Has this made you think of mass shootings over the years? I had a lawyer friend look at the proofs for the Las Vegas shooting in 2017. For some reason she couldn’t pull all the evidence from public agencies. Go figure. I guess we’ll never know, at least from her. God rest her soul. She died from cancer last year.)
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government. (My wife says there’s a steady stream at the church pantry where she works. Remember your mortgages, car payments, insurance payments, and salary raises. Are you behind? Hopefully the government stimulus (subsidy) will help.)
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to and take control of what children learn in school. (Having taught in public schools. Yes. There is a set curriculum; they call it the canon, similar the books listed in the Bible, along with the appropriate versions and edits. In my humble opinion, there’s also a minimum on civics and the law, far too little.)
7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the government and schools because the people need to believe in only government knowing what is best for the people. (I think our kids would be much helped by having more spiritual lives, and I’m not talking through religion. Shame on the Catholic Church in which I was raised for tolerating pedophiles. Afterward, I claimed to be an atheist for a time, and that’s when I struggled most in life. My relationship with God has much improved since then. This would be a topic for another blog entry.)
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor. (If you didn’t know it, Income Tax is illegal, and well orchestrated. Ever try reading a tax code book?)
I might be skeptical about the source of such a recipe for a Communist takeover. However, I saw a few interviews and seminars with a gentlemen by the name of Yuri Bezmenov. Now, I add this title on YouTube: “Former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov warns America (1984).” Actually look for anything on Yuri. He’s obviously not afraid of breaking down the social tactics and approaches for you and of all places on mainstream American news. He speaks in detail about psychological operations and warfare, especially with regard to the long game takeover.
Now, take into the idea of infiltration. Check out a TV series called “The Americans,” which ran on FX for six seasons from 2013 to 2018. Pure entertainment?
In fact, infiltration is in our United States playbook when it came to installing governments and their respective leaders. Don’t worry about the reason. We’ll find the reason or create one to destabilize a country, especially when it is the desire of private industry to do so. Weapons of Mass Destruction ring a bell? One of the ancillary benefits of war, is, well it creates refugees, sometimes which no country accepts after all is said and done. Therefore, with an organization such as the United Nations with its many arms, often take advantage. To learn more, I recommend visiting Bitchute.com to watch a 17-part series called “Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal” produced by documentarian Janet Ossebaard which speaks to the origins of the Khazars among others. While you are at it, look up a fellow named Benjamin Fulford. He is a former Forbes reporter specializing on Asian financial matters and has written several columns mentioning the Khazarian Mafia.
Now to address the ultimate ends despite the means of the Cabal and/or Deep State or whatever you prefer to call it: Globalists, invisible elites, etc. What exactly does infiltration mean. The idea is not to fire a single bullet to change a course of events or control a people. The following text resides at HeritageHistory.com. It’s called “Satan, Prince of This World,” (Don’t be put off by the title) by William Guy Carr, and a principle chapters in it discusses the views of one Adam Weishaupt and a prior chapter called Secret Societies, and importantly Weishaupt’s relation to the House of Rothschild. Think back to Richard A. Rothschild. Ossebaard goes into detail about both secret societies or the Illuminati and Weishaupt in her video series on BitChute. In the “Code of Illuminism,” Weishaupt recommends to followers the conquest of lawyers who are “true demons,… teachers, university professors, and the superiors of seminaries whenever possible.”
I close with this. Take the word sorcery, and its meaning of power over others. There are about 100 references to it in the Bible, but I guess it depends on the version. One in particular: The Book of Revelation 18:23 says, “And the light of a lamp will shine in you no more, and the voice of bridegroom and bride will be heard in you no more, for your MERCHANTS were the great ones of the Earth, and all Nations were deceived by your sorcery.”